Table of Contents
Introduction
Chiasmus is a rhetorical device in which the order of terms in parallel clauses is reversed to create a balanced and stylistically impactful expression. In this article, we will define chiasmus and illustrate this figure of speech with examples from literature.
Let’s get started with the definition of chiasmus!
What is chiasmus?
Chiasmus is a figure of speech in which words, grammatical constructions, or concepts are repeated in reverse order, in the same or a modified form. In other words, in this stylistic device clauses display inverted parallelism. Let’s consider some examples to illustrate this:
Examples:
Both of the following examples are illustrations of chiasmus. They feature the reversal of terms in parallel clauses, creating a balanced and stylistically impactful structure:
- “He knowingly led and we followed blindly”:
- This example highlights the contrast between the leader’s knowledge and the followers’ blindness, emphasizing the deliberate action of the leader and the unquestioning nature of the followers.
- “Swift as an arrow flying, fleeing like a hare afraid”:
- Here, the chiasmus is evident in the juxtaposition of “flying” and “fleeing” as well as “swift as an arrow” and “like a hare afraid.” This structure adds a sense of symmetry and poetic balance to the sentence.
The above examples demonstrate the use of this figure of speech to convey contrasting ideas or actions through the reversal of terms.
Let’s consider now the reasons why this figure of speech is used!
Why do Writers use Chiasmus?
Writers use chiasmus for its nuanced impact on language and expression. This versatile figure of speech adds depth to literary works by emphasizing contrasts, creating balance, and enhancing memorability:
- Emphasizing Contrasts:
- This rhetorical device allows writers to highlight sharp distinctions between ideas, characters, or situations through its mirrored structure, contributing to a more vivid and impactful portrayal.
- Creating Balance and Symmetry:
- By structuring parallel clauses in a mirrored fashion, this stylistic device brings a sense of balance and aesthetic symmetry to language. This can enhance the rhythm and flow of sentences, capturing the reader’s attention.
- Enhancing Memorability:
- The distinctive and often poetic nature of this figure of speech makes it memorable. Writers leverage this figure of speech to etch key concepts or phrases into the reader’s mind, ensuring a lasting impact and reinforcing the central themes of their work.
Chiasmus is not the only figure of speech that uses inverted clauses; antimetabole does too! Let’s consider the difference between the two!
Chiasmus Vs. Antimetabole
Chiasmus is a rhetorical device characterized by mirrored or inverted parallelism in successive clauses, emphasizing contrasts through balanced symmetry.
The excerpt “Despised, if ugly; if she’s fair, betrayed” from Mary Leapor’s “Essay on Woman” exemplifies this figure of speech, where the inverted repetition doesn’t mirror the exact words but the structure.
Antimetabole, however, is a related device involving straightforward repetition of words or phrases in reverse order, creating a direct and rhythmic emphasis.
Here is an example:
Pleasure’s a sin, and sometimes sin’s a pleasure.
From “Don Juan” (1824) by Lord Byron
The above excerpt exemplifies antimetabole, involving a reversal in structure with the repetition of the same words.
As you can see, both chiasmus and antimetabole share a common thread in their use of word repetition for heightened impact. However, these figures of speech diverge in how they deploy this repetition, leading to distinct stylistic effects.
Similarities:
- Repetition: Both chiasmus and antimetabole involve a form of repetition, enhancing the rhetorical appeal of a statement.
- Emphasis: By repeating words or phrases, both devices serve to emphasize specific points, making them more memorable and impactful.
Differences:
- Structural Variation: The primary distinction lies in their structural approach. Chiasmus is characterized by a mirrored or inverted parallelism in successive clauses, creating a balanced and symmetrical pattern. In contrast, antimetabole involves the straightforward repetition of words or phrases in reverse order in two successive clauses, without the mirroring effect.
- Grammatical Construction: Chiasmus often involves mirroring not only words but also the grammatical structure of phrases or clauses. Antimetabole, on the other hand, focuses solely on the reversal of the words themselves.
- Emphasis on Contrast: Chiasmus frequently emphasizes contrasts or opposing ideas through its mirrored structure. Antimetabole, while still capable of highlighting contrast, achieves this more directly through the repetition in reverse order.
| Aspect | Chiasmus | Antimetabole |
|---|---|---|
| Repetition Style | Mirrored or inverted parallelism in successive clauses | Straightforward repetition of words or phrases in reverse order in two successive clauses |
| Structural Pattern | Balanced and symmetrical pattern | Direct repetition without mirroring |
| Grammatical Elements | Mirroring not only words but also grammatical structure | Focuses solely on reversing the order of words |
| Emphasis | Emphasizes contrasts or opposing ideas through symmetry | Directly emphasizes points through repetition |
| Stylistic Effect | Creates a sense of balance and aesthetic symmetry | Offers a more straightforward and rhythmic repetition, enhancing flow |
Examples of Chiasmus from Literature
Chiasmus is often used by poets and writers because it provides a distinctive and versatile means of expression, allowing them to emphasize contrasts, create balanced and memorable structures, and infuse their work with a heightened aesthetic quality.
1. Quote by Socrates:
“Bad men live that they may eat and drink,
Socrates (Fifth century B.C.)
whereas good men eat and drink that they may live.”
In the above excerpt, the first clause presents the actions of “bad men,” and the second clause presents the contrasting actions of “good men,” with the reversal of the order in the parallel structure adding rhetorical emphasis.
This figure of speech in this quote enhances the impact of the message and showcases the stylistic versatility of this figure of speech.
2. William Shakespeare’s Othello:
But O, what damned minutes tells he o’er
From “Othello” by William Shakespeare
Who dotes, yet doubts; suspects, yet strongly loves.
The lines from Shakespeare’s Othello contain an example of chiasmus. The structure “Who dotes, yet doubts; suspects, yet strongly loves” exhibits the reversal of terms in parallel clauses, creating a balanced and contrasting pattern.
In this case, the chiasmus is used to convey the complex and contradictory emotions experienced by the character, enhancing the expressive and rhetorical impact of the passage.
3. Samuel Johnson’s “The Vanity of Human Wishes”:
By day the frolic, and the dance by night.
From “The Vanity of Human Wishes” (1749) by Samuel Johnson
In the above excerpt, the structure involves the reversal of terms in parallel clauses: “by day” is matched with “by night,” and “the frolic” is matched with “the dance.”
This creates a balanced and symmetrical pattern, contributing to a stylistically impactful expression.
Chiasmus is often used to highlight contrasts and bring attention to the parallelism of ideas, as seen in this line where the daytime activity is contrasted with its nighttime counterpart.
4. Mary Leapor’s “Essay on Woman”:
Despised, if ugly; if she’s fair, betrayed.
From Mary Leapor, “Essay on Woman” (1751)
The above excerpt from Mary Leapor’s “Essay on Woman” is an example of chiasmus. The structure involves the reversal of terms in parallel clauses, creating a balanced and contrasting pattern.
In this case, the chiasmus is used to express the unfortunate fate of women, highlighting the contrasting treatment based on their appearance.
The reversal in the order of terms, with “ugly” paired with “despised” and “fair” paired with “betrayed,” adds rhetorical emphasis and contributes to the overall impact of the statement.
Conclusion
Chiasmus is a powerful rhetorical device that involves the mirrored or inverted parallelism of terms, providing a nuanced and impactful tool for poets and writers alike. It is used by these literary craftsmen to emphasize contrasts, create a sense of balance and symmetry, and enhance the memorability of their expressions. When incorporated into your writing, this figure of speech elevates the stylistic appeal, adds depth to your narrative, and leaves a lasting impression on readers by fostering a unique and memorable linguistic experience.
Related Pages: